Forged In Fire

[applepi]

How did you find those cards?  Otto could probably let warlord be of of the better turtling mages, although his 9 channeling sets him back.  I thinks it's really funny how otto's attack is called maul.  I know it's the name of his weapon but the double meaning is nice.

[Wildhorn]

How did you find those cards?  Otto could probably let warlord be of of the better turtling mages, although his 9 channeling sets him back.  I thinks it's really funny how otto's attack is called maul.  I know it's the name of his weapon but the double meaning is nice.

They are from the post about GAMA Trade Show.

[Moonglow]

It is starting to feel though that the Warlord is becoming less warlord and more engineer lord...  spose it depends on your vision for the role/class.  There are plenty of engineer warlord archtypes in history, just didnt seem quite what the first warlord role card depicted to me.

How did you find those cards?  Otto could probably let warlord be of of the better turtling mages, although his 9 channeling sets him back.  I thinks it's really funny how otto's attack is called maul.  I know it's the name of his weapon but the double meaning is nice.

[Wildhorn]

It is starting to feel though that the Warlord is becoming less warlord and more engineer lord...  spose it depends on your vision for the role/class.  There are plenty of engineer warlord archtypes in history, just didnt seem quite what the first warlord role card depicted to me.

How did you find those cards?  Otto could probably let warlord be of of the better turtling mages, although his 9 channeling sets him back.  I thinks it's really funny how otto's attack is called maul.  I know it's the name of his weapon but the double meaning is nice.

You need war engines to do war... don't worry, the soldiers preview will come out too

[isel]

otto would be a bit boring if you find a deck with many walls, you put 3 walls in the middle and you spent x turns to do a conjuration strategic while otto make repairings on walls and put armor tokens, i put him in my wizard speel book to repair my wizard tower, would be funny.

[Wildhorn]

otto would be a bit boring if you find a deck with many walls, you put 3 walls in the middle and you spent x turns to do a conjuration strategic while otto make repairings on walls and put armor tokens, i put him in my wizard speel book to repair my wizard tower, would be funny.

Flying creature or archer tower would counter the wall strategie.

For the Wizard Tower, spending 11 mana and 6 SP to save a 7 mana and 2 SP card instead to just include another one is discutable.

[kailas]

It is starting to feel though that the Warlord is becoming less warlord and more engineer lord...  spose it depends on your vision for the role/class.  There are plenty of engineer warlord archtypes in history, just didnt seem quite what the first warlord role card depicted to me.

How did you find those cards?  Otto could probably let warlord be of of the better turtling mages, although his 9 channeling sets him back.  I thinks it's really funny how otto's attack is called maul.  I know it's the name of his weapon but the double meaning is nice.

I would say the alternative warlord is an engineer, i think his abilities will even do smth with conjurations. The playstyle of the main warlord will not change much.

[Wildhorn]

Do we get a preview today? I am addicted to those, I need my daily fix

[Laddinfance]

Well in Scott's announcement from GAMA from last night there was another preview, Otto Kronig.

[Wildhorn]

Well in Scott's announcement from GAMA from last night there was another preview, Otto Kronig.

Yeah... But it was yesterday...

[Laddinfance]

Did you find "ignite" from GAMA?

I know now I'm just digging through previous days for previews you missed lol. Trust me more is coming. Maybe I can get some art out today... We'll have to see.

[Wildhorn]

Did you find "ignite" from GAMA?

I know now I'm just digging through previous days for previews you missed lol. Trust me more is coming. Maybe I can get some art out today... We'll have to see.

Ignite? Where? Gimme a link!

[Laddinfance]

You can find the picture >>HERE<<. It's the third picture in the album. Scott spills the beans about the spell in the comments.

But If you want to save time...

Ignite (Incantation)
Target Corporeal Creature or Conjuration
Level 1 Fire
Mana Cost 2
Range 0-2
Quick Action

If the target does not have a burn condition on them, then they gain one burn condition.

"Do not attempt to control fire; just start it and let the rest happen on its own." - Infernicus, Warlock

[Wildhorn]

Thanks.

I saw the photo when it was posted, but could not see what the cards on the picture was and didnt follow the comments.

So, what will be the preview of tommorow? 

[Wildhorn]

Soooooo... About that Arcane Corruption...