Seeking Dispel vs. stacked Enchantments

[stargazer]

First post here, sorry if this is redundant. I did some searches here on the forum but didn't find the same question. 

If my mage casts a Seeking Dispel onto an opposing creature who has stacked Enchantments, do I get to pick which Enchantment gets dispelled? Does the creature's controller pick? or is it FIFO, LIFO? 

Thanks in advance for taking the time to help out!

[paradox22]

The caster gets to decide which unrevealed enchantment gets dispeled.

[pixelgeek]

The caster has to select a target unrevealed enchantment as part of the casting of the spell.

[Shad0w]

They are both correct.

As the caster of Seeking Dispel you choose what enchant you are going to destroy. Once this choice is made the or player not not reveal this enchantment but they may reveal another face down enchant just not that one you picked. 

[Demyan]

So if I know my opponent is going to cast a Seeking Dispell (against a Wiz which just used his Familiar to look at the Nullify) this would be the only situation were it would make sense to stack a Reverse Magic on the target.

Since the target of the Seeking Dispell can not be revealed (lets still say its the Nullify), the Reverse Magic would trigger normaly, and the Nullify would remain (still hidden) on the target.

Edit: Well nevermind, always remember these spells wrong, wont work since Seeking Dispell targets the Enchantment and not the Mage.

[Shad0w]

So if I know my opponent is going to cast a Seeking Dispell (against a Wiz which just used his Familiar to look at the Nullify) this would be the only situation were it would make sense to stack a Reverse Magic on the target.

Since the target of the Seeking Dispell can not be revealed (lets still say its the Nullify), the Reverse Magic would trigger normaly, and the Nullify would remain (still hidden) on the target.

Edit: Well nevermind, always remember these spells wrong, wont work since Seeking Dispell targets the Enchantment and not the Mage.

Good to see you are taking an in depth look at this. 
Correct BTW