Hi sIKE
Thanks for the response. It's late over here and I'm in no fit state to analyse the response. However I notice the scenarios all have Dispel in your hand to combat it. So sorry to not discuss your 2 scenarios but I do know my 2 examples.
In my example 1, there is no defence. And having an Obelisk out afterwards as creature-light Forcemaster is an added boon.
In my example 2, I later realised there is a 50/50 defence. Opponent seeing the hidden enchantment has to guess on Dispel or Seeking Dispel. If he chooses Dispel (probable as more common) and I reveal at the end of the First Quickcast Phase or if he chooses Seeking Dispel and I reveal at the end of Deployment, unlucky. Of course he could choose both. Or he could dismiss it as just another Decoy...
When you treat Mind Control as playable only "Between Action Phases in the Action Stage", the card is still very powerful but at least there is a defence in example 1 (which you and I, sIKE, have discussed already, citing examples that avoided revealing in the Ready Stage).
Now I am obviously not the only one to find the wording ambiguous.
We get instant answers from official sources to blatantly obvious rules questions. But the harder questions that could create a precedent that they then have to contradict (like with Battle Fury's flip-flop) are met with silence.
I would like to play Forcemaster in my Mage Wars games day this Saturday. I would like some clarity on this. I know you are a Playtester, sIKE. Are you authorised to rule on Mind Control being "Anytime except during an Action Phase"? Because I need some hard proof on my phone browser when I pull off a stunt without any defence that changes the game. Because the card doesn't say that, it's ambiguous.
Yet you say there is no need for a clarification? It's a devastating manoeuvre without a defence if you can reveal during the Ready Stage! How can I prove it's game legal?
So unless somebody with a Blue Arcane Wonders sign-on finally makes an explicit ruling on this long-standing baby elephant in a very crowded room of elephants, I will probably end up playing some other mage. Because I can't be bothered to argue the toss over when I can reveal this spell because of its ambiguous wording.
So please someone out there with rules authority, take pity and please make an explicit Reveal Mind Control ruling here?
(And while you are at it, there are quite a few other bigger elephant rules queries gestating that were ducked in other threads)
Many thanks, everyone, for setting me right on this. I just wish that my opponents would see it so clear cut...