It seems this is the folder of choice for spammers and it's flooding my Recent list with crap. Is there some way to just ignore this entire sub-forum by checkbox or something?

Thanks

I built a preliminary version of this deck with the Wizard as my mage. I've got 3 Royal Archers (1/6th of my book points), 2 Gorgon Archers, and I've got 2 Ivarium Longbows as well. I went with the wizard because it's very easy to get out the Gorgons with Gate to Voltari, leaving you only the Royals to hard cast. I threw in a couple Hydras and a Basilisk for melee support and it's pretty brutal. I tested it against the Beastmaster, and Redclaw and BM had over 6 weak tokens each and every Timber Wolf had at least 2. I think the BM could have still won it if I threw down a heal though. Still very brutal firing line.  I enjoyed it very much, thank you for the idea!

So there's a thread on the Geek where someone asked if Conjurations bonuses stack. I replied that as long as the Conjuration was not Legendary or Unique, then it was ok. The counterargument from two different people was that you can't have multiple bonuses from a source of the same name. Now, I know this is true of enchantments, but I could not find in the rules anything about Conjurations. Basically, that counterargument is saying that stuff like Tooth & Nails, and Mana Flowers/Crystals do not stack, but I know that to be untrue even though I don't have a rules passage on my side either. Can someone official chime in either here or there? I'd like to know if I HAVE been playing it wrong.

Thanks

Thanks Arcanus! That justifies Battle Fury's spot in my build! I was thinking it only applied to same action multiple attacks, but wasn't sure.

Quote from: "Koz" post=2365

Quote from: "Nihilistiskism" post=2359

@Koz: I think your comment is not applicable. If Organized Play is supposed to be a reflection of the game, then it should not, by the definition of its parameters, penalize certain mages for doing what they do best.

-nihil

Your original post said nothing about Organized Play or the parameters therein.  You asked how people are playing in less than one hour.  I suggested that perhaps your choice of playing Priestess might be causing your games to go longer than others who are not playing the Priestess.  It's a completely valid point.  Logically speaking, if you tend to play a mage that is known for slower play, then you are probably in for longer games than if you play a mage that is known for being more aggressive.  How this affects the Priestess in Organized Play is a completely separate issue from your original question.  

Since you are fond of logical fallacies, what you have done here is known as shifting the goal posts.  

You are misrepresenting, or misinterpreting, my position, Koz. My intent to dictate this thread toward the nature of Organized Play was implied, as otherwise there would be no presented grounds for the initial query or interest. If you feel I didn't represent my original intent sufficiently, then I believe that it is you who is guilty of the logical fallacy of "missing the point" since others who responded immediately knew the purpose of the thread, i.e. Shadow's response was entirely dictated toward Organized Play. ;-)

In this post, you very rudely posit that your original post was CLEARLY implying Organized Play. I was merely pointing out poppycock. Kudos to Shadow for being a mind-reader. Your post was identical to any of the extended time threads on BGG, none of which even mention Organized Play, so the natural assumption on your original post is to think you think the game plays too long. Nothing more, nothing less.

I hope the Necromancer brings an abundance of nonliving creatures. I think the core only has 2 if you count Whirling Spirit. That makes a few of the conjurations less than desirable. But if you could summon whole hordes of nonliving creatures, they'd be much more effective.

Hey Tox, welcome to the boards. Loved your vids on MW!