May 05, 2024, 05:00:36 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nihilistiskism

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
31
General Discussion / Re: No Lash of Hellfire in Core Spell Tome ?
« on: November 13, 2012, 10:01:27 AM »
@Klaxas: The part where I said "I understand your position, but mine will remain unchanged" was me telling you that we aren't going to agree on this matter. There were two parts to that statement.

1) "I understand your position..." I'm not stupid, and understand what you have said. Repeating yourself indicates to me that you feel that I didn't read what you wrote the first time. Consider that theory debunked. I read it. I understood it.

2) "..., but mine will remain unchanged." After reading and understanding your position fully I am still in disagreement with your premises.


To humor you for absolutely no reason:

Yes. It does mildly disgust me when I see a "Mage X Only" card dropped in-game, because it reminds me that my choices in spellbook building are artificially neutered, and that design has ultimately, in my opinion, taken the lazy route in balancing the game. When a game has very, very few faults, the ones that do exist stick out as extremely sore thumbs.

I put my case, position, and part in this conversation to rest.

-nihil

32
Rules Discussion / Re: Zone Control?
« on: November 13, 2012, 09:50:56 AM »
Quote from: "Shad0w" post=2697

Nothing in the first set is based off controlling a zone. I hope that helps


Because "controlling a zone" isn't something that actually exists in this game. <- further clarification

-nihil

33
General Discussion / Re: Website Server Work Being Done Tonight
« on: November 13, 2012, 09:45:08 AM »
So it looks like stuff that is posted now is looking ok (except Avatars are still tiny). Are old posts forever going to be in that ugly limbo of not having avatars or signatures? Or clickable user info at all, apparently?

It's kind of neutering my desire to post when I don't know if my post will be there tomorrow, if it is there if it will be recognized as mine, or if this site is going to explode the internet and be the downfall of modern communication mediums.  :P

-nihil

34
Creative / Re: Custom wood/stone board:
« on: November 13, 2012, 09:44:14 AM »
Thank you. I think I may try and locate some slightly more decorative hinges for the final piece. Gotta go back to the supply store for some clasps, anyway, and every time I look at the project I think "those hinges I picked out are pretty awful looking."

-nihil

35
Strategy and Tactics / Re: Equipment vs Equipment destruction balance
« on: November 11, 2012, 10:49:49 AM »
@paradox: I'm usually the one being abrasive, but...you could have been less abrasive, just then.

@OP:

Because of the nature of equipment, its cost-to-effect ratio is a null-point to the argument, as I see it. Equipment is always going to be more effective than equipment destruction that is singular in design. By that I mean spells like "Dissolve" that exclusively destroy equipment cards. A best-case scenario for a card like Dissolve creates a null-gain for both Mages, where each expended the same amount of resource to have the board exactly as before the equipment was equipped. Except that equipment is proactive, and equipment destruction is reactive. Unless you happen to choose to put a Dissolve in your hand the turn I choose to equip something, I have a full turn with my equipment in place. So the whole "null gain" argument is also kind of out the window. Proactive vs. Reactive.

Now, Cards that have a secondary or inverse-primary effect (like explode) will always be more cost-effective than equipment cards, because they advance game in other ways than simply denying me something for which I paid.

While I feel that, right now, equipment very much trumps equipment destruction, I think it's a minor play on the game, and ultimately doesn't swing balance in one direction or the other too dramatically.

-nihil

36
League / Tournament Play / Re: How to run the league?
« on: November 11, 2012, 10:40:19 AM »
Organizing a tournament for a game that takes a long time is fundamentally challenging. You can't play 2 out of 3 games, you can't efficiently do round-robin, and any kind of Swiss format will be drawn from an unrealistic statistics pool.

Ultimately, I feel like Mage Wars is probably going to have to go the route of other "long" games in that, as far as tournament play goes, it's not going to be accessible to the 9-5 crowd on a weekday. I think this is going to, by necessity, be a game that requires the better part of a day on the weekend.

Saturday or Sunday tournament from 10:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. with a 1 hour lunch break gives an 8-hour window in which to run your event. At that point you could realistically do a Swiss format. The pool for statistic pull would be small, but should be accessible.

The weekday 9-5 crowd has always been left behind in terms of long-game tabletop miniatures. Mage Wars is really no different. People can't get together and run a Warhammer tournament in 3 hours. The same will be true of Mage Wars.

It makes the game less accessible, certainly, but the nature of design for the game kind of mandates this problem to the realm of unsolvable problems.

-nihil

37
General Discussion / Re: Website Server Work Being Done Tonight
« on: November 11, 2012, 08:18:31 AM »
Also: Signature lines?

-nihil

38
General Discussion / Re: Website Server Work Being Done Tonight
« on: November 11, 2012, 04:01:38 AM »
It's weird. When I post, now, it works fine, but going to look at an older post I'm a visitor with no picture and no post count. :-P

-nihil

39
Creative / Re: Custom wood/stone board:
« on: November 11, 2012, 03:54:04 AM »
Cement Board Tape:

[attachment=54]20121111_031306.jpg[/attachment]

One tile removed to show birch base:

[attachment=55]20121111_031321.jpg[/attachment]

40
Creative / Re: Custom wood/stone board:
« on: November 11, 2012, 03:52:41 AM »
Another view of full board:
[attachment=52]20121111_031229.jpg[/attachment]

Hinges:
[attachment=53]20121111_031241.jpg[/attachment]

41
Creative / Re: Custom wood/stone board:
« on: November 11, 2012, 03:51:35 AM »
Full board:
[attachment=50]20121111_031214.jpg[/attachment]

Close of stone:
[attachment=51]20121111_031221.jpg[/attachment]

42
Creative / Re: Custom wood/stone board:
« on: November 11, 2012, 03:50:51 AM »
Alrighty!

So, after some small mix of guesswork combined with light testing, it proved that my suspicions re: plaster/cement were correct. Both mediums prefer to crumble rather than crack, with the plaster being susceptible to powdering entirely.

Slate's propensity for fragility turned out to be the ultimate undoing of that medium's potential for use in the project. It cannot be acquired at all to be thin enough so as to be usable.

I made the decision to incorporate actual stone tiles into the project. I was really hoping that plaster would work, because it is very light, but the stone won't make the finished piece too heavy, altogether. I'm expecting a total weight of anywhere between 10 and 15 lbs, not that I'm using stone.

I lucked upon some good, grey, stone tiles that are measured at 8'' x 8'', which is the size of a Mage Wars board tile.

The base of the piece is 1/4'' sanded birch. Pine would have been preferred, as Pine is a slightly more durable wood, but the birch is significantly lighter, and cuts more cleanly than Pine, and once sealed and lacquered it should more than do the job.

The frame of the piece is comprised of 1'' x 1 1/2'' pine boards.

The measurements are as follows:

Base of 1/4" soft, sanded Birch: 27" x 35": (later to be cut in-half across the 35" dimension, see below)

As the 1 1/2" x 1" pine boards will be sitting broad-side upon the base, and the tiles measure at 8" x 8" the base needed an extra 3" above the surface area of the tiles on both sides.

2 pine boards at dimensions of 1 1/2" x 1" cut @ 35" (later to be cut in-half, see below)

2 pine boards at dimensions of 1 1/2" x 1" cut @ 24" (2 feet)

The two longer pine boards lay the length of the birch base, while the two shorter pine boards lay at a 90° to the other two boards between them.

----------------

Because I want the finished piece to fold inward upon itself, once everything has been measured, the longer pine boards will be cut in-half, as will the birch base along the 35" dimension. Two 1 1/2" brass hinges will be employed to hold the unit together prior to gluing/mortaring of the stone tiles. Once cut, the frame will be wood-glued to the base, and clamped  overnight, prior to stapling at the corners/edges, and finally, some 1/2" wood screws, 2 at each corner joint, then finally, hinged together.


GLUING THE TILES

Once the entire base is prepared (cutting, gluing, screws/staples, hinges), I will begin the process of laying a fastening facilitator to the interior base of the piece. For this purpose I have chosen to implement some self-adhesive cement board tape. The concept here is that the board tape is a mesh medium that will act as an intermediary between the tiles and the birch base. Once laid, the tiles will be placed on top of the mesh, and here's where the fun begins:

A grid will be prepared to lay uniformly between each of the tiles and the frame. The grid will be comprised of scrap wood left over from the original cutting from the larger birch board which is now comprising the base/frame of the piece. This grid will ensure that when the tiles are cracked the framework (the separations between the zones) will not be compromised. Essentially, each individual "zone" (tile) will be cordoned off from the others, as well as the frame, by a very thin strip of wood.

The tiles will be cracked using a point-chisel and ball-peen hammer. Once the cracks are to my satisfaction, a solution comprised of 50% elmer's all-purpose glue and 50% water will be "poured" over each tile. The dilution of the water will allow the solution to permeate between each individual crack and crevice in the tiles. Now this is why the cement board tape was applied: When the solution is poured, the cement board tape will be raising each tile just a fraction of a millimeter from the birch base. The liquid solution will well BELOW the tiles, through the mesh of the board tape, and, when hardened, the tiles will be attached to the base through the tape onto the birch base. The solution will be applied only so that it is approximately half as deep as the height of the tiles, so approximately 1/8" to 1/4" deep. This will sit for a few days, at least. I may heat-treat the whole piece in the sun provided I get a particularly sunny day. Otherwise, I am prepared to leave it alone for 4-5 days untouched.

Once the glue solution is dried to satisfaction, I will apply a white unsanded grout that has been mixed with black ink to provide the desired color. The frame separating the zones will be removed, and this grout spread across the entire interior of the frame, over the tile work, to provide the color and hard-surface cover for the cracked tiles, as well as providing the interior holding agent between the tiles.

That is the bulk of the project. Other details to follow. Here are some pictures:

-nihil

43
General Discussion / Re: testing
« on: November 09, 2012, 12:04:38 AM »
Hurray! We're all n00bs, again! :-D

-nihil

p.s. yep. captcha thing is bullshit to 11.

44
General Discussion / Re: No Lash of Hellfire in Core Spell Tome ?
« on: November 07, 2012, 11:46:39 PM »
Klaxas, I understand your position, but mine will remain unchanged:

I do not believe it is necessary to produce Mage "X" Only cards to embellish the theme of the game. The game is highly thematic without those kinds of intrusions. For as much "theme" as they offer, they dilute the cardpool for every other Mage in the game, and bottleneck distribution. Whatever the distribution method AW chooses for Mage Wars, if they do Mage X Only cards they are dedicating X percent of a distribution to a single mage, whereas they could, instead, dedicate 100% of every distribution to every Mage.

You love theme. That's awesome. I don't knock that. Love away. I don't think that's justification for removing options from the greater majority of Mages because I think your love of theme can be easily satisfied in other ways.

-nihil

45
General Discussion / Re: Is there a way to ignore Off-Topic?
« on: November 07, 2012, 11:36:15 PM »
This board is tortuously slow, for the most part, but that has nothing do do with the content within the threads. Threads sit there until you ping the server for them. New threads don't slow down the system. Not how it works.

And...yes...the spambots are rampant. Something could be done about that...

-nihil

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10