Decent in the less popular game mode means very little.

The scrutiny hasn't shifted, Blood wave (and JBM) have been trash tier for a long time (maybe even since their respective Day1).

Don't understand how anyone can defend Veteran tokens, or Battle Orders. His rule card is basically blank accept for battle skill.

I want to like this guy, I bought his expansion within weeks of release. He just does less than all other mages, and gets stomped on because he's terrible at most everything, and decent at..... punching?

oh yeah, this is sounding promising.....

I like how the vote doesn't just say "He's fine" as an option

It also doesn't a vote for "Nerf Him" either, weird.

True though, Bloodwave is pretty good in Domination. L

Anvil Warlord is pretty good, I consider her to definitely be viable. However the BloodWave needs help, its not right that there is an unspoken ban, that no-one will take that stinky trash-caster to the dance.

Something needs to be done to help the Bloodwave. The fact that Orc's are so poorly represented in this game is racist. Orc's lives matter too you know, guys. They just as good as Human or Dwarves or Elfs

Yes, it is unable to fulfill the mandatory action of moving closer so it has free reign of its action options.  This also means that you can Siren's Call a friendly creature that's in your zone and then send it out to wreak havoc.

only if you send it somewhere it gets hindered, otherwise its coming right back

I would never give up quick summoning on the original beastmaster. Fast is an trait you can get from an enchant, and has limited usage. Losing quick summon is a nerf to beast master. Nerf the wizard, swap fast and zap

But really, just allow wounded pray to target mages, its just a weaker Marked for Death.

Priest only really needs that 10 channeling he got cheated out of, maybe remove the once per turn restriction on his burn.

Interesting one here, what if the Warlords battle orders still were a quickspell, but you gained 1 mana when you used them rather then spending 1 mana. Cause you know, Warlords draw there strength from there armies, and cast better when riding high on that officer ego.

It absolutely counts as 3 damage. No argument there, the rules say that exactly, but do you actually add the damage? If you remove a condition maker that counted as 3 damage, you then add 3 damage tokens to the creature? This seems wrong. Also not sure if finite life really matters. The damage Taint counts as already can't be healed or regenerated, and were not adding life, we're removing a poison condition that counts as 3 damage.

I hate to challenge the great Zuberi, but I feel like an official ruling is needed here.

Taint feels like a 3 damage marker always under the effect of finite life

cut card allowance in half like academy. Only 3 lvl1's allowed, and only 2 copies of everything else. Might shake up your local meta with completely gutting many books or strategies. I do feel you though, hate it when you have successful dissolved 3 mage wands off a wizard, while dealing with 4 nullify's, and the very next turn there is another mage wand.