811
Spellbook Design and Construction / Re: Adramelech Face Melter
« on: October 09, 2014, 10:11:19 AM »What are you going to do vs someone who someone who summons [mwcard=MW1C01]Adramelech, Lord of Fire[/mwcard] Poo your pants like the rest of us?I'm pretty sure his reaction is to smile at how much mana they invested and then melt the enemy mages face before Adramelech can do anything significant. He cost 24 and swings for 6 dice plus burns and can't attack the turn he is summoned. That means if Adramelech is summoned round 2 he has not even broke even with straight fireballs until at least round 6. By then the match is probably over. Adramelech is too slow.
Even minor creatures like [mwcard=MW1C15]Firebrand Imp[/mwcard] and [mwcard=MW1C16]Flaming Hellion[/mwcard] seems like you would be force to ignore those?
Naturally you have weaknesses vs all things anti-flame (Flame -2, Burnproof, Flame immune conjurations)
Excellent vs Druid, not so hot (forgive me) vs Warlock.
You might be right. I thought i´d would be a auto-win for the male Warlock here with Lord Of Fire.
I tried to looked into it:
ADRAMELECH FACE MELTER LORD OF TERROR
19 Hawkeye 1 19 Enchanters Ring 2
Ring of Curses 2 Cheetah Speed 1
Move 1 Move 1
25 Fireshaper Ring 3 25 Lord of Fire 24
Adramelechs Touch 4 Bear Strenght 1
Move 1 Move 1
26 Marked For Death 5 9 Ring of Curses 2
Fireball 8 Shift enchantment 1
Reveal Hawkeye 1 Reveal Bear Srength 3
Reveal Cheetah Speed 3
10 dice attack 8 dice attack
19 9
This is hardly a laughing matter for the Adramelech Facemelter. The Lord of Terror is somewhat behind here in mana and deal lesser damage. Lesser chance to get a burn and no way to keep the opponent burning like the facemelter but he has 5 more hp from the beginning and he has one more action each round. The Facemelter has a 10 mana lead here but the Lord of Terror has a 0 mana cost attack so thats probably going to change.
Is Lord of Terror really far behind here?