Arcane Wonders Forum

General Category => Website Support and Feedback => Spellbook Builder => Topic started by: pixelgeek on February 03, 2014, 03:20:18 PM

Title: Does the SBB need a Max column?
Post by: pixelgeek on February 03, 2014, 03:20:18 PM

Quick question for everyone.

Is the Max column in the card data table useful? Or would there be a more useful column of data to include?

Title: Re: Does the SBB need a Max column?
Post by: Moonglow on March 20, 2014, 07:39:35 PM

Count is probably more useful, Max is possibly more useful as a flag when exceeded in the book?

I was wondering if the spell cost for the specific mage/book would be possible to id?  So when I scan down and I've a couple of spellbook points left, what can I afford?

Title: Re: Does the SBB need a Max column?
Post by: pixelgeek on March 20, 2014, 09:26:16 PM

Quote from: Moonglow on March 20, 2014, 07:39:35 PM

Count is probably more useful, Max is possibly more useful as a flag when exceeded in the book?

It already warns you about that but of the two would you say Count is more important?

Quote from: Moonglow on March 20, 2014, 07:39:35 PM

I was wondering if the spell cost for the specific mage/book would be possible to id?  So when I scan down and I've a couple of spellbook points left, what can I afford?

So having the app calculate the cost for each card based on your Mage?

Title: Re: Does the SBB need a Max column?
Post by: Moonglow on March 20, 2014, 09:47:16 PM

Yeah, calculating the cost for your mage would be awesome!  And yes, I thought count was more important than max - since in practical terms that's what (most times) limits how many I can have :)  To be fair I do sometimes make a proxy for a card that I'd never have two of in play, despite having two in my book (i.e. priest's staff).

Title: Re: Does the SBB need a Max column?
Post by: pixelgeek on March 21, 2014, 08:40:01 AM

Quote from: Moonglow on March 20, 2014, 09:47:16 PM

Yeah, calculating the cost for your mage would be awesome!

Let me see what I can do.